Chapter 11 The Constrained Governance of Socio technical Transitions, Evidence from electric mobility in Scotland
Published: November 2016
Component type: chapter
Published in: Low Carbon Mobility Transitions
Parent DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-2847
Electric Vehicles (EVs) embody a number of technical innovations which have the capacity to make substantial contributions to prominent societal objectives associated with improving energy security, increasing energy efficiency, promoting low-carbon mobility and reducing local air pollution. Fostering a transition to an electric mobility (e-mobility) personal transport system represents a strategic aim of most economically developed nations and is a central feature of the European Commission’s vision of an integrated and sustainable transport system. For this vision to be achieved, EVs will need to overcome formidable barriers associated with structural lock-ins to the existing internal combustion engine vehicle, technical deficiencies linked to EV attributes, citizen preference for proven technologies and the embedded interests of system agents.
This chapter outlines how the transition to an e-mobility personal transport system is being managed in Scotland by evaluating the governance structure which has been established to support the uptake of EVs. This governance structure is considered in terms of the strategic, tactical and operational activities which aim to facilitate the e-mobility transition and the role of reflexive governance in evaluating the progress so far made. Specific attention is paid to how the agency of the Scottish Government is constrained in its ability to manage the transition due to the defined authority of the government and the local circumstances of Scotland.
- Craig Morton, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK (Author) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-9580
- David Beeton, Urban Foresight, Newcastle, UK (Author)
For the source title:
- Debbie Hopkins, Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, UK (Editor) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-8989
- James Higham, Department of Tourism, University of Otago, NZ and University of Stavanger, Norway (Editor) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1405-7035
Morton & Beeton, 2016
Morton, C. & Beeton, D. (2016) "Chapter 11 The Constrained Governance of Socio technical Transitions, Evidence from electric mobility in Scotland" In: Hopkins, D. & Higham, J. (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-3291
ACEA, (2015). The automobile industry pocket guide. Available at: http://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/POCKET_GUIDE_2015-2016.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Beeton, D. A., Phaal, R. & Probert, D. R. (2008). Exploratory roadmapping for foresight. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 4(4), 398-412. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2008.020871
Butcher, L. (2015). Transport in Scotland. Available at: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN03192. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Climate Change (Scotland) Act, (2009). Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2009/12/contents. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Cohen, M. J. (2012). The future of automobile society: a socio-technical transitions perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663962
Department for Transport, (2002). Powering future vehicles strategy. Available at: http://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/reports/DfT%20Powering%20Future%20Vehicles%20Strategy%20-%20July%202002.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Dijk, M., Orsato, R. J. & Kemp, R. (2013). The emergence of an electric mobility trajectory. Energy Policy, 52, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.024
Ekins, P., Dresner, S., Potter, S., Shaw, B. & Speck, S. (2009). The case for green fiscal reform: Final report of the UK Green Fiscal Commission. Available at: http://www.greenfiscalcommission.org.uk/images/uploads/GFC_FinalReport.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
European Commission, (2007). Directive 2007/46/EC – Establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32007L0046&from=EN. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
European Commission, (2014). Regulation 443/2009 – Setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0443-20140408. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Eurostat, (2015). Transport Theme: Table – Modal split of passenger transport. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/data/database. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Foxon, T. J., Hammond, G. P. & Pearson, P. J. G. (2010). Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.002
Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D. & Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Governing societal transitions to sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2012.044032
Garcia, M. L. & Bray, O. H. (1997). Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Available at: http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/1997/970665.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2172/471364
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Geels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930).Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357319
Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B. & Abraham, C. (2011). Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(5), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.02.001
Kemp, R., Schot, J. & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310
King, J. E. (2007). The King Review of Low Carbon Cars Part One: The potential for CO2 reduction. Available at: www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/presentations/Julia%20King.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
King, J. E. (2008). The King Review of Low Carbon Cars Part Two: Recommendations for action. Available at: http://www.climatesolver.org/sites/default/files/pdf/bud08_king_1080.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Markard, J., Raven, R. & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Marsden, G. & Rye, T. (2010). The governance of transport and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(6), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.014
Mazur, C., Contestabile, M., Offer, G. J. & Brandon, N. P. (2015). Assessing and comparing German and UK transition policies for electric mobility. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.005
Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
Morton, C., Anable, J. & Brand, C. (2014). Policy making under uncertainty in electric vehicle demand. Proceedings of the ICE - Energy, 167(3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.14.00006
Nillson, M., Hillman, K., Rickne, A. & Magnusson, T. (2012). Paving the Road to Sustainable Transport: Governance and innovation in low carbon vehicles. Oxford: Routledge.
Offer, G. J., Howey, D., Contestabile, M., Clague, R. & Brandon, N. P. (2010). Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system. Energy Policy, 38(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.040
Santos, G., Behrendt, H. & Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1), 46–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.03.002
Schot, J., Hoogma, R. & Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system. Futures, 26(10), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6
Schwanen, T., Banister, D. & Anable, J. (2011). Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10), 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005
Scottish Government (2011). National performance framework. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/933/0124202.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Scottish Government (2015). Low emission strategy for Scotland. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/01/3287. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Shaheen, S. & Chan, N. D. (2015). Evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models. In Beeton, D. & Meyer, G. (eds.). Electric vehicle business models: Global perspectives. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12244-1_10
Shaw, J., MacKinnon, D. & Docherty, I. (2009). Divergence or Convergence? Devolution and Transport Policy in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(3), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0899r
Smith, A., Stirling, A. & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
Steinhilber, S., Wells, P. & Thankappan, S. (2013). Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 60, 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.076
The Committee on Climate Change (2015). Sectoral scenarios for the fifth carbon budget – Technical report. Available at: https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/sectoral-scenarios-for-the-fifth-carbon-budget-technical-report/. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Transport Scotland (2010). Low carbon vehicle procurement support scheme. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/935/0103593.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Transport Scotland (2013). Switched on Scotland: A roadmap to widespread adoption of plug-in vehicles. Available at: http://www.transport.gov.scot/report/j272736-00.htm. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Transport Scotland (2014). Guidance on the implementation of The Cleaner Road Transport Vehicles (Scotland) Regulations 2010 SSI 2010/390. Available at: http://www.transport.gov.scot/report/guidance-implementation-cleaner-road-transport-vehicles-scotland-regulations-2010-ssi-2010390. Accessed 1 Feb. 2016.
Wells, P. & Nieuwenhuis, P. (2012). Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1681–1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.008