Chapter 6 The Challenges of Changing the Paradigms, Regimes and Structures of Low Carbon Mobility
Published: November 2016
Component type: chapter
Published in: Low Carbon Mobility Transitions
Parent DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-2847
The chapter provides an introduction to some of the issues associated with enabling low carbon mobility transitions. It first discusses issues of regime change and transition and highlights the need for specific types of transition. It is argued that the nature of desired regime change appears to inherently require the involvement of the state and therefore this also raises significant issues of policy change and learning. The chapter then discusses the complexity of multi-scale transitions and the extent to which this raises issues of agency and structure, with emphasis on the capability to enable transition and positive change itself being related to different framing of policy interventions and learning. The chapter then concludes by noting the limitations of capacities to enable low carbon mobility transitions without there being third degree policy learning and major paradigm change.
- C. Michael Hall, Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, University of Canterbury, New Zealand (Author) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-4587
For the source title:
- Debbie Hopkins, Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, UK (Editor) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-8989
- James Higham, Department of Tourism, University of Otago, NZ and University of Stavanger, Norway (Editor) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1405-7035
Hall, C.M. (2016) "Chapter 6 The Challenges of Changing the Paradigms, Regimes and Structures of Low Carbon Mobility" In: Hopkins, D. & Higham, J. (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-3305
Bailey, I. & Wilson, G.A. (2009). Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: Technocentrism, ecocentrism, and the carbon economy. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2324–2341. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40342
Berkhout, F., Smith, A. & Stirling, A. (2004). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K. (Eds.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48-75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421.00013
Cohen, M. J. (2010). Destination unknown: Pursuing sustainable mobility in the face of rival societal aspirations. Research Policy, 39, 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.018
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
Farla, J., Alkemade, F. & Suurs, R.A. (2010). Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1260-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.014
Fine, B. & Leopold, E. (1993). The World of Consumption. London: Routledge.
Geels, F.W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Geels, F.W. & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.009
Geels, F.W. & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Geerlings, H., Shiftan, Y. & Stead, D. (Eds.). (2012). Transition towards Sustainable Mobility: The role of instruments, individuals and institutions. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gössling, S., Hall, C.M., Ekström, F., Brudvik Engeset, A. & Aall, C. (2012). Transition management: a tool for implementing sustainable tourism scenarios? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20, 899-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.699062
Hall, C.M. (2009). Degrowing tourism: Décroissance, sustainable consumption and steady-state tourism. Anatolia, 20, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2009.10518894
Hall, C.M. (2010). Crisis events in tourism: Subjects of crisis in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 13, 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2010.491900
Hall, C.M. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first and second to third order change? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19, 649-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.555555
Hall, C.M. (2013). Framing behavioural approaches to understanding and governing sustainable tourism consumption: Beyond neoliberalism, 'nudging' and 'green growth'? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21, 1091-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2013.815764
Hall, C.M. (2015). Economic greenwash: On the absurdity of tourism and green growth. In V. Reddy and K. Wilkes (Eds.), Tourism in the Green Economy (pp. 339-358). London: Earthscan by Routledge.
Hall, C.M., Le-Klähn, D-T. & Ram, Y. (2016). Tourism, Public Transport and Sustainable Mobility. Bristol: Channelview.
Hall, C.M. & Veer, E. (2016). The DMO is dead. Long live the DMO (or, why DMO managers don't care about post-structuralism). Tourism Recreation Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2016.1195960. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2016.1195960
Hall, P.A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D. & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14(1), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469709
Kemp, R. & Rotmans, J. (2004). Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. In B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, K. Green (Eds) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 137-167). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421.00019
Köhler, J., Whitmarsh, L., Nykvist, B., Schilperoord, M., Bergman, N. & Haxeltine, A. (2009). A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecological Economics, 68, 2985-2995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.027
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition Management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23, 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
Maréchal, K. (2010). Not irrational but habitual: The importance of 'behavioural lock-in' in energy consumption. Ecological Economics, 69, 1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.004
Mäkinen, K., Kivimaa, P. & Helminen, V. (2015). Path creation for urban mobility transitions: Linking aspects of urban form to transport policy analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 26, 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2014-0115
Nykvist, B. & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006
Rip, A. (2006). A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance – and its ironies, in, Voss, J-P., Bauknecht, D. and Kemp, R. (Eds), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development (pp. 82-100), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847200266.00013
Rotmans, J. & Kemp, R. (2008) Detour ahead: a response to Shove and Walker about the perilous road of transition management. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4004let
Seyfang, G. (2011). The New Economics of Sustainable Consumption: Seeds of change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1273-1285. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282
Shove, E. & Walker, G. (2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39, 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310
Slezak, M. (2016). The Great Barrier Reef: a catastrophe laid bare. The Guardian, 7 June, http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/07/the-great-barrier-reef-a-catastrophe-laid-bare
Smith, A., Stirling, A. & Berkhout, F. (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
Southerton, D., Chappells, H. & Van Vliet, B. (Eds) (2004). Sustainable Consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Strandell, A. & Hall, C.M. (2015). Impact of the residential environment on second home use in Finland - testing the compensation hypothesis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 12-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.011
Suarez, F.F. & Oliva, R. (2005). Environmental change and organisational transformation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth078
Unruh, G.C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
Upham, P., Virkamäki, V., Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M. & Wadud, Z. (2015). Socio-technical transition governance and public opinion: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.024
van den Bergh, J., Truffer, B. & Kallis, G. (2011). Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.010
van der Brugge, R. & Rotmans, J. (2007). Towards transition management of European water resources. Water Resources Management, 21, 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9052-0
van der Brugge, R., Rotmans, J. & Loorbach, D. (2005). The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change, 5(4), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7
Vanloqueren, G. & Baret, P.V. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38, 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008
Wallner, H.P., Narodoslawsky, M. & Moser, F. (1996). Islands of sustainability: A bottom-up approach towards sustainable development. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1763-1778. https://doi.org/10.1068/a281763
Weaver, D. (2009). Reflections on sustainable tourism and paradigm change. In Gössling, S., Hall, C.M. and Weaver, D.B. (Eds), Sustainable Tourism Futures (pp. 33-40). New York: Routledge.
Whitmarsh, L., Seyfang, G. & O'Neill, S. (2011). Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public 'carbon capable'? Global Environmental Change, 21, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011
Wholey, D. & Brittain, J. (1989). Characterizing environmental variation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 867-882. https://doi.org/10.2307/256572