Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Overview
DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-45-6-4342 | ISBN: 978-1-910158-45-6 |
Published: May 2015 | Component type: chapter |
Published in: Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee 2nd edition | Parent DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-45-6-1517 |
Abstract
Osteoarthritis of the knee is one of the most common causes of painful loss of mobility in middle-aged and elderly people in many populations and is the main indication for knee replacement surgery. From the early days of arthroplasty, it was recognised that arthritis was often limited to the medial (or lateral) compartment of the knee and, in the pioneering operation of MacIntosh 1 , metal spacers could be used in one compartment or both. Gradually, however, as the advantages of bicompartmental arthroplasty were appreciated, unicompartmental (or partial) replacement was less and less practised, and in some countries almost disappeared. With the introduction of tricompartmental replacement, a large body of surgical opinion concluded that osteoarthritis of the knee was a disease of the whole joint (like osteoarthritis of the hip) and that common sense required the replacement of all the articular surfaces to provide long-term relief of symptoms.
Sample content
Contributors
- John Goodfellow (Author)
- John O'Connor (Author)
- Hemant Pandit (Author)
- Christopher Dodd (Author)
- David Murray (Author)
Cite as
Goodfellow, O'Connor, Pandit, Dodd & Murray, 2015
Goodfellow, J., O'Connor, J., Pandit, H., Dodd, C. & Murray, D. (2015) "Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Overview" In: (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-45-6-4342
Save, bookmark or recommend
 Save on Mendeley |  Share on Twitter |  Share on LinkedIn |  Share on Facebook |
References
MacIntosh DL. Hemiarthroplasty of the knee using a space occupying prosthesis for painful varus and valgus deformities. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1958; 40-A: 1431.
Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1968: Suppl 277:7-72.
Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273): 151-6.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199112000-00023
Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273): 157-64.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199112000-00024
Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1437-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0
Cobb JP. Patient safety after partial and total knee replacement. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1405-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60885-0
Andrews B, Willis-Owen CA, Aquil A, Cobb JP. A cost-utility analysis of knee arthroplasty using data from three national registries Paper #668. AAOS. New Orleans; 2014.
Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70(2): 170-5.
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679909011257
Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee 2009; 16(6): 473-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006
Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(12): 1628-31.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.25193
Marmor L. Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (192): 75-81.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198501000-00010
Neider E. Schlitten prothese, Rotations knie und Scharnierprothese modell St. Georg and Endo-Modell. Orthopade 1991; 20 170-80.
Marmor L. Preface. Prothese Unicompartimentale du Genou. Paris: Expansion Scientifique; 1998.
Marmor L. The Modular (Marmor) knee: case report with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; (120): 86-94.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197610000-00014
Palmer SH, Morrison PJ, Ross AC. Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (350): 143-8.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199805000-00020
Ashraf T, Newman JH, Desai VV, Beard D, Nevelos JE. Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval analysis. Knee 2004; 11(3): 177-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.03.004
Collier MB, Engh CA, Jr., McAuley JP Engh GA. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(6): 1306-14.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200706000-00020
Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Shrive NG, inventors; Endoprosthetic knee joint devices. British Patent Application 1534263. 1974.
Goodfellow J, O'Connor J. The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (276): 245-52.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199203000-00034
White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73(4): 582-6.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071640
Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, inventors; Oxford Knee (femoral). UK, French, German, Swiss Patent EP 0327397, Irish Patent 62951, US Patent 5314482. 1989.
Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(6): 983-9.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.0800983
Svard UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83(2): 191-4.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.0830191
Barrington JW, Emerson RH. The Oxford Knee: First report of 20-year follow-up in the US. AAOS. New Orleans; 2010. Paper no 22.
Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW, Oxford Hip & Knee Group. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(8): 970-6.
https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.25552
Forsythe ME, Englund RE, Leighton RK. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cementless perspective. Can J Surg 2000; 43(6): 417-24.
Liddle AD, Pandit H, O'Brien S, Doran E, Penny ID, Hooper GJ, Burn PJ, Dodd CA, Beverland DE, Maxwell AR, Murray DW. Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(2): 181-7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411
White SH, Roberts S, Jones PW. The Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement: the first 100 cases. Knee 2012; 19(1): 36-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.12.006
Alvand A, Khan T, Jenkins C, Rees J, Jackson W, Dodd C, Price A. (2015). The impact of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) on surgical accuracy and functional outcome during unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR): A prospective randomised controlled study. British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Annual Meeting, Telford, UK.
Barrington JW, Emerson RH. What is the most accurate insertion platform for a mobile-bearing UKA? A case-control, blinded radiographic analysis. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Dallas, Tx, USA; 2013.
Gunther T, Murray DW, Miller RK, Wallace D, Carr AJ, O'Connor JJ, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee 1996; 3(1-2): 33-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-0160(96)00208-6
Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71(1): 145-50.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971010-00023
Murray DW, Marks BE, Kontochristos L, Dodd CA, Pandit H. The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: long term results. Chin J Joint Surg 2013; 7(4): 540-4.
Liddle AD. Failure of unicompartmental knee replacement [DPhil]. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2014.
Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95(8): 702-9.
https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00520