HOME | CHECKOUT | ABOUT | FAQ | CONTACT US |
 
Welcome Guest [create an account] or log-in:
email
password

Chapter 9 Low Carbon Transition in Finnish Mobility, The clash of experimental transport governance and established practices

DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-3306

ISBN: 978-1-910158-64-7

Published: November 2016

Component type: chapter

Published in: Low Carbon Mobility Transitions

Parent DOI: 10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-2847

Abstract

Finland is a country of few people and relatively long distances, and this places pressure on maintaining an efficient private transport infrastructure, while at the same time visions of low carbon mobility systems exist and are increasingly created, particularly in more densely populated areas. In this chapter we analyse the drivers and barriers for low-carbon mobility in Finland. Recent years have witnessed a phase where several structures have become more supportive of change than ever before, both through long-term focus and experimental governance. Transition towards low carbon transport regimes shows promise particularly in the Helsinki Metropolitan region of Finland. Yet even when the transition towards sustainable mobility is advancing, barriers and drivers co-exist both at the level of the global and national landscapes and of national and metropolitan regimes. Nevertheless, transition can be evidenced by an increasing number of regime drivers and a reducing number of barriers.

Sample content

Click here to download PDF

Contributors

  • Paula Kivimaa, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK and Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland. (Author) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2812-8017
  • Armi Temmes, School of Business, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland (Author)

For the source title:

Cite as

Kivimaa & Temmes, 2016

Kivimaa, P. & Temmes, A. (2016) "Chapter 9 Low Carbon Transition in Finnish Mobility, The clash of experimental transport governance and established practices" In: Hopkins, D. & Higham, J. (ed) . Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-64-7-3306

References

Apajalahti, E-L., Temmes, A. & Lempiälä, T. (2015). Incumbent organisations engaging to field-changinginnovations: cases of PV and EV charging. Submission 18764 Accepted to Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2015.

Azar, C. & Sandén, B. (2011). The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.003

Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. & van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18, 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002

Breznitz, D., Ketokivi, M. & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Demand- and user-driven innovation. In Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System, Taloustieto Oy: Helsinki, 71-102

ElectricTraffic (2016). http://www.sahkoinenliikenne.fi/sites/sahkoinenliikenne_fi/files/attachments/sahkoautokanta_suomessa_2015-q3_asl_1.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.

Erkkilä, K., Nylund, N-O., Pellikka, A-P., Kallio, M., Kallonen, S., Kallio, M., Ojamo, S., Ruotsalainen, S., Pietikäinen, O. & Lajunen, A. (2013). eBUS - Electric bus test platform in Finland. EVS27 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Barcelona. http://www.transsmart.fi/files/35/eBUS_Electric_Bus_Test_Platform_in_Finland.pdf.

EVE programme (2016). http://www.tekes.fi/globalassets/julkaisut/eve_final_report.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan. 2016.

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, B, 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021

Goodwin, P. (1999). Transformation of transport policy in Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33, 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-8564(99)00011-7

Guardian (2014). 10 July, http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/jul/10/helsinki-shared-public-transport-plan-car-ownership-pointless. Accessed 26 Feb. 2016.

Harborne, P., Hendry, C. & Brown, J. (2007). The development and diffusion of radical technical innovation: The role of bus demonstration projects in commercializing fuel cell technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 19, 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320601168060

Helsingin Sanomat (2016). http://www.hs.fi/kaupunki/a1453445641199?jako=8525e7c86a615c7fc7317a619ea8d940&ref=tw-share. Accessed 26 Feb. 2016.

Hoogma, R, Kemp, R, Schot, J. & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The approach of Strategic Niche Management. Spon Press, London.

HSL (2016). https://www.hsl.fi/en/helsinki-regional-transport-authority. Accessed 12 Jan. 2016.

ITS World Conference (2016). http://itsworldcongress.com/schedule/. Accessed 26 Feb. 2016.

Kivimaa, P., Boon, W. & Antikainen, R. (unpublished). Commercialising university inventions for sustainability – a case study of (non-)intermediating 'cleantech' at Aalto University. Submitted for review in Science and Public Policy.

Kivimaa, P. & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008

Kivimaa, P. & Virkamäki, V. (2014). Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1629

Laurikko, J., Pihlatie, M., Nylund, N-O., Halmeaho, T., Kukkonen, S., Lehtinen, A., Karvonen, V., Mäkinen, R. & Ahtiainen, S. (2015). Electric city bus and infrastructure demonstration environment in Espoo, Finland. EVS28 International Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition, Kintex, Korea.

LiVi (The Finnish Transport Agency) (2015) MaaS services and business opportunities. Reports of the Finnish Transport Agency 56/ 2015. http://www2.liikennevirasto.fi/julkaisut/pdf8/lts_2015-56_maas_services_web.pdf.

Lovio, R. & Kivimaa, P. (2012). Comparing alternative path creation frameworks in the context of emerging biofuel fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 773-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667925

Maas Alliance (2016). http://maas-alliance.eu/. Accessed 26 Feb. 2016.

MaaS programme (2016). https://www.tekes.fi/en/programmes-and-services/tekes-programmes/mobility-as-a-service/. Accessed 25 January 2016.

Mäkinen, K., Kivimaa, P. & Helminen, V. (2015). Path creation for urban mobility transitions - Linking aspects of urban form to transport policy analysis. Management of Environmental Quality 26(4), 485 – 504. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2014-0115

New Transport Policy Club (2016). http://www.lvm.fi/documents/20181/859937/P%C3%A4%C3%A4+pilviss%C3%A4%2C+jalat+maas.+Uuden+liikennepolitiikan+klubin+futuriikki/e0ccbf7e-9937-4abc-bbf9-3dd412890c1b?version=1.0. Accessed 7 March 2016.

Nylund, N-O., Tamminen, S., Sipilä, K., Laurikko, J., Sipilä, E., Mäkelä, K., Hannula, I. & Honkatukia, J. (2015). Tieliikenteen 40 %:n hiilidioksidipäästöjen vähentäminen vuoteen 2030: Käyttövoimavaihtoehdot ja niiden kansantaloudelliset vaikutukset. VTT Research Report VTT-R-00752-15 (Report on economic impacts of decreasing carbon dioxide emissions of transport. In Finnish)

Nyqvist, B. & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 75, 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006

Peixoto, I., Temmes, A. & Lovio, R. (2013). How the emergence of multiple paths shapes a new field: examining variety and deviation in fuel production. Fifth International Symposium on Process Organisation Studies. Theme: The Emergence of Novelty in Organisations. 20-22 June. Greece.

Schwanen, T., Banister, D. & Anable, J. (2011). Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45, 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005

Smith, A. & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41, 1025–1036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012

Statistics Finland (2015a). http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/khki/2014/khki_2014_2015-12-14_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.

Statistics Finland (2015b). http://www.stat.fi/til/vaenn/2015/vaenn_2015_2015-10-30_tie_001_en.html. Accessed 7 March 2016.

TEM (Ministry of Employment and the Economy) (2010). Demand and user-driven innovation policy. Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy 48/2010. https://www.tem.fi/files/27547/Framework_and_Action_Plan.pdf.

Temmes, A., Räsänen, R-S., Rinkinen, J. & Lovio, R. (2013). The Emergence of Niche Protection through Policies: The Case of Electric Vehicles Field in Finland. Science & Technology Studies 26, 37-62.

Temmes, A., Virkamäki, V., Kivimaa, P., Upham, P., Hildén, M. & Lovio, R. (2014). Innovation policy options for sustainability transitions in Finnish transport. Tekes Reviews 306/2014.

TransEco & TransSmart (2016). http://www.transeco.fi/en, http://www.transsmart.fi/transsmart/in_english. Accessed 25 January 2016.

Turnheim, B. & Geels, F.W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy 50, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060

Unruh, G.C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

Upham, P., Kivimaa, P., Mickwitz, P. & Åstrand, K. (2014). Climate policy innovation: a socio-technical transitions perspective. Environmental Politics, 23 (5), 774-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923632

Upham, P., Kivimaa, P. & Virkamäki, V. (2013). Path dependence and expectations in transport innovation policy: the case of Finland and the UK, Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.004

Upham, P., Virkamaki, V., Kivimaa, P., Hilden, M. & Wadud, C. (2015). Socio-technical transition governance and public opinion: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Journal of Transport Geography 46, 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.024

Yarime, M. (2009). Public coordination for escaping from technological lock-in: its possibilities and limits in replacing diesel vehicles with compressed natural gas vehicles in Tokyo. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 1281-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.010

Available

Published in Low Carbon Mobility Transitions

Hardback format [Details]Price: £85.00Copies / Delivery by post
Terms and conditions of purchase | Privacy policy